The White House Correspondents’ Dinner Is…A Problem

Here’s why.

Elizabeth Spiers
2 min readMay 1, 2022

The White House Correspondents’ Dinner is an event of relevance to 0.00000005% of people, but I loathe it because it’s a nationally televised event where the rest of America sees a bunch of journalists and politicians and celebrities rubbing shoulders in the same room, and this reinforces the conspiracy that the right loves to embrace that all of these people are colluding against them.

When I was the editor-in-chief of The New York Observer, I didn’t allow our journalists to attend the dinner. I did allow our media reporter to cover the extent to which journalists are obsessed with it, though, and in 2011, I sent two of our reporters to D.C. to cover the several days of parties, the reaction, and so on. That particular year, President Obama sat at the dinner, secure in the knowledge that Osama bin Laden had been killed. The people who would normally break that news were at the dinner.

So the people who broke the news were an aide of Donald Rumsfeld’s and … Dwayne “the Rock” Johnson. As we noted in the subsequent story (one of my favorite’s from that period), Mr. Johnson did not attend the dinner.

I’m happy to have some kind of normalcy again where we have a President who’s not thin skinned and can handle the skewering comedians typically dish out at this…

--

--

Elizabeth Spiers

Writer, NYU j-school prof, political commentator, digital strategist, ex-editor in chief of The New York Observer, founding editor of Gawker